Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33851 - 33860 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33851 - 33860 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entered a guilty plea to this charge after the circuit court denied his motion to suppress. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201773 - 2017-11-14
entered a guilty plea to this charge after the circuit court denied his motion to suppress. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201773 - 2017-11-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
titled “Motion for Reconsideration and Compulsion for Attorney to Act on Defendant’s Behalf
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161831 - 2017-09-21
titled “Motion for Reconsideration and Compulsion for Attorney to Act on Defendant’s Behalf
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161831 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
] In addition, he appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145219 - 2015-07-27
] In addition, he appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145219 - 2015-07-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
and filed a WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion, which the circuit court denied. The motion raised at least twelve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32944 - 2014-09-15
and filed a WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion, which the circuit court denied. The motion raised at least twelve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32944 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the exclusionary rule to deny his motion to suppress the results of a nonconsensual, warrantless blood draw. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894674 - 2024-12-26
to the exclusionary rule to deny his motion to suppress the results of a nonconsensual, warrantless blood draw. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894674 - 2024-12-26
David J. Kappus v. United Fire and Casualty Company
of the Kappuses' complaint, the trial court granted United's motion to stay the action against United, to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15030 - 2005-03-31
of the Kappuses' complaint, the trial court granted United's motion to stay the action against United, to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15030 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jamie P. Fritz v. Mid-States Footwear Corporation
that the evidentiary materials before the trial court on the motion for summary judgment failed to raise an issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10503 - 2017-09-20
that the evidentiary materials before the trial court on the motion for summary judgment failed to raise an issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10503 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Rex B. Roberts
. The issue is whether the trial court properly denied Roberts' motion to suppress physical evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8149 - 2017-09-19
. The issue is whether the trial court properly denied Roberts' motion to suppress physical evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8149 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael D. Sarnowski, Jr.
of a child and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Sarnowski argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10478 - 2005-03-31
of a child and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Sarnowski argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10478 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rex B. Roberts
to deliver. The issue is whether the trial court properly denied Roberts' motion to suppress physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8149 - 2005-03-31
to deliver. The issue is whether the trial court properly denied Roberts' motion to suppress physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8149 - 2005-03-31