Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33851 - 33860 of 44730 for part.
Search results 33851 - 33860 of 44730 for part.
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Sprosty
980.08(5) reads, in pertinent part, as follows: If the court finds that the person is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13344 - 2017-09-21
980.08(5) reads, in pertinent part, as follows: If the court finds that the person is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13344 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was there for other reasons than sexual assault of a child.” ¶10 For his part, Wegner testified at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84916 - 2014-09-15
was there for other reasons than sexual assault of a child.” ¶10 For his part, Wegner testified at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84916 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is not an essential part of any exposition of ideas, when it is utterly devoid of social value, and when it can cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92099 - 2013-01-29
is not an essential part of any exposition of ideas, when it is utterly devoid of social value, and when it can cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92099 - 2013-01-29
State v. James H. Lindvig
ordinary negligence "not by any different mental state on the part of the actor, but by the existence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10302 - 2005-03-31
ordinary negligence "not by any different mental state on the part of the actor, but by the existence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10302 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael J. P.
, not by Schuppel--and there is no evidence that Schuppel played any part in seeking the capias from the judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10040 - 2005-03-31
, not by Schuppel--and there is no evidence that Schuppel played any part in seeking the capias from the judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10040 - 2005-03-31
Michelle L. Peters v. Joseph A. Peters
that this was an “arbitrary, subjective” valuation on his part. ¶7 On cross-examination, Zoeller was asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3909 - 2005-03-31
that this was an “arbitrary, subjective” valuation on his part. ¶7 On cross-examination, Zoeller was asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3909 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. That statute provides, in relevant part: (1) If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87674 - 2014-09-15
. That statute provides, in relevant part: (1) If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87674 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
as part of a traffic stop of a third party, and that he relayed this information to Lossman, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51566 - 2014-09-15
as part of a traffic stop of a third party, and that he relayed this information to Lossman, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51566 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was “a big part in why [Graves] probably isn’t dead and that’s good.” The court also recognized that Graves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50757 - 2010-06-08
was “a big part in why [Graves] probably isn’t dead and that’s good.” The court also recognized that Graves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50757 - 2010-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
included in his appendix affidavits from two of his sisters and his niece that were not part of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119568 - 2014-08-18
included in his appendix affidavits from two of his sisters and his niece that were not part of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119568 - 2014-08-18