Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33851 - 33860 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 33851 - 33860 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522537 - 2022-05-17
reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522537 - 2022-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record suggests that any report would have supported the NGI plea. Therefore, Enrique has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134400 - 2015-02-04
in the record suggests that any report would have supported the NGI plea. Therefore, Enrique has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134400 - 2015-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of mandamus. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070339 - 2026-02-03
of mandamus. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070339 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude there is no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209884 - 2018-03-15
independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude there is no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209884 - 2018-03-15
Lamonte Simmons v. Jeffrey Endicott
prejudiced by lack of access to confidential records, Wisconsin appellate courts may determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7921 - 2005-03-31
prejudiced by lack of access to confidential records, Wisconsin appellate courts may determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7921 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109015 - 2014-03-18
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109015 - 2014-03-18
State v. Paul L. Eickert
with the presumption that the sentence is reasonable, and the burden is on the defendant to show a basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13735 - 2005-03-31
with the presumption that the sentence is reasonable, and the burden is on the defendant to show a basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13735 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
denied the motion, ruling that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33531 - 2014-09-15
denied the motion, ruling that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33531 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165263 - 2017-09-21
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165263 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186967 - 2017-09-21
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186967 - 2017-09-21