Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33861 - 33870 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.

Donald R. Stringer v. Joyce D. Stringer
the maintenance award and the property division of his divorce judgment, claiming that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9263 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for the delay in retaining new counsel.[2] While new counsel claimed that she needed additional time to analyze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122857 - 2014-09-30

Sydney J. Harris v. Chauncy Steed Harris
that because Tanner was not working, it would be appropriate for Harris to claim the exemptions. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2606 - 2005-03-31

State v. Beverly G.
resource available. Beverly claims that it is not in Ariel’s best interests to terminate Beverly’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17898 - 2005-05-02

[PDF] City of Madison v. Timothy J. Duffy
). Duffy filed a suppression motion, challenging the underlying stop. He claims that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16077 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ralph Anton
of Counsel In order to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, Anton has to show: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10427 - 2005-03-31

Mary Ann Strnad v. Edward Strnad
that Mary Ann’s arguments defeat the change of character claim, [but] they fail in regard to identity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4220 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Lorenzo Winford
theory. Focusing solely on his own self-serving testimony, he claims that "[t]he record is devoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11881 - 2014-09-15

Michael Kielblock v. Hytec Manufacturing, Inc.
We initially note that every person is presumed to know the law and cannot claim ignorance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6761 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on his claims. Where the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080568 - 2026-02-24