Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33881 - 33890 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 33881 - 33890 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
State v. Lawrence M. Ventrice
, and the case proceeded to trial. On the second day of trial, the court ruled that Ventrice could not assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4042 - 2005-03-31
, and the case proceeded to trial. On the second day of trial, the court ruled that Ventrice could not assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4042 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Jacobson
case. The State submitted that another officer was present when Alvin gave the statement, Ronald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6720 - 2017-09-20
case. The State submitted that another officer was present when Alvin gave the statement, Ronald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6720 - 2017-09-20
State v. Kovac Kidd
. Further, the court found that the psychiatrist’s testimony was not specific to the case. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7044 - 2005-03-31
. Further, the court found that the psychiatrist’s testimony was not specific to the case. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7044 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Green v. Sherrie L. Zuber
The trial court asked the prosecutor, “What blood alcohol test by statute or by the cases does that come
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15075 - 2017-09-21
The trial court asked the prosecutor, “What blood alcohol test by statute or by the cases does that come
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15075 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ann M. Masko v. City of Madison
2003 WI App 124 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2267
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5593 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 124 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2267
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5593 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Tower Insurance Company, Inc. v. Gary Carpenter
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9865 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9865 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 40
& October 2024 Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879798 - 2024-11-18
& October 2024 Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879798 - 2024-11-18
[PDF]
WI 40
& October 2024 Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879798 - 2024-11-18
& October 2024 Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879798 - 2024-11-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a third time. In our most recent decision, we detailed the facts of Mathis’s case. See State v. Mathis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024376 - 2025-10-21
for a third time. In our most recent decision, we detailed the facts of Mathis’s case. See State v. Mathis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024376 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy B. Sullivan
, that this was not other acts evidence but was relevant direct evidence. We agree. ¶7 In this case, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5784 - 2017-09-19
, that this was not other acts evidence but was relevant direct evidence. We agree. ¶7 In this case, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5784 - 2017-09-19