Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33881 - 33890 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 33881 - 33890 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rule 809.23(3). [5] The unsworn statement Burris filed with his motion for reconsideration also did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93420 - 2013-02-27
. Rule 809.23(3). [5] The unsworn statement Burris filed with his motion for reconsideration also did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93420 - 2013-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
such statement, and denied that a CHIPS petition was ever prepared in this case. No. 2010AP2515-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76543 - 2014-09-15
such statement, and denied that a CHIPS petition was ever prepared in this case. No. 2010AP2515-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76543 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of “[a]ny written or recorded statement concerning the alleged crime made by the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27319 - 2014-09-15
of “[a]ny written or recorded statement concerning the alleged crime made by the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27319 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statement that any risk for reoffense was too great a risk was not particularized to Swiedarke, since any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253149 - 2020-01-30
statement that any risk for reoffense was too great a risk was not particularized to Swiedarke, since any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253149 - 2020-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2016AP1625-CRNM 7 necessarily match witness statements, Estrada did not have Estrada-Cortes’s DNA
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183781 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2016AP1625-CRNM 7 necessarily match witness statements, Estrada did not have Estrada-Cortes’s DNA
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183781 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Cecil L., Jr.
does not reflect a reasonable basis for the determination or a statement of the relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5866 - 2017-09-19
does not reflect a reasonable basis for the determination or a statement of the relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5866 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and raise the same issue on appeal, the court’s opinions on both appeals will use the same statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28683 - 2014-09-15
, and raise the same issue on appeal, the court’s opinions on both appeals will use the same statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28683 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this statement with no legal reasoning. ¶12 I note that the circuit court addressed the issue of ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833101 - 2024-08-01
this statement with no legal reasoning. ¶12 I note that the circuit court addressed the issue of ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833101 - 2024-08-01
[PDF]
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
that the minimal statement on the judgment of conviction cannot be construed as a written order denying bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12127 - 2017-09-21
that the minimal statement on the judgment of conviction cannot be construed as a written order denying bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12127 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, as the circuit court noted, the “recantation” is not exactly that. The statement says that “[o]n April 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134619 - 2017-09-21
, as the circuit court noted, the “recantation” is not exactly that. The statement says that “[o]n April 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134619 - 2017-09-21