Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3391 - 3400 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3391 - 3400 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction. The Honorable Jonathan D. Watts entered the order denying Grant’s motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155727 - 2017-09-21
of conviction. The Honorable Jonathan D. Watts entered the order denying Grant’s motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155727 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denied Thomas’s postconviction motions. The court determined that Thomas was not in custody when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105183 - 2017-09-21
denied Thomas’s postconviction motions. The court determined that Thomas was not in custody when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105183 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
motions. The court determined that Thomas was not in custody when he made his inculpatory statements, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105183 - 2013-12-10
motions. The court determined that Thomas was not in custody when he made his inculpatory statements, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105183 - 2013-12-10
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to change his prison custody classification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93275 - 2014-09-15
to change his prison custody classification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93275 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
request to change his prison custody classification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93275 - 2013-02-20
request to change his prison custody classification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93275 - 2013-02-20
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. This case arose on cross-motions for summary judgment after psychologist Marc Ackerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32834 - 2008-06-03
PER CURIAM. This case arose on cross-motions for summary judgment after psychologist Marc Ackerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32834 - 2008-06-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
., and Snyder, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case arose on cross-motions for summary judgment after psychologist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32834 - 2014-09-15
., and Snyder, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case arose on cross-motions for summary judgment after psychologist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32834 - 2014-09-15
Lori B. v. Steven B.
Steven. Until June 1995, she and Steven had joint custody of Kristin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14663 - 2005-03-31
Steven. Until June 1995, she and Steven had joint custody of Kristin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14663 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 11, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
to joint custody and held open placement and child support because they were residing together. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98052 - 2013-06-10
to joint custody and held open placement and child support because they were residing together. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98052 - 2013-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., born March 8, 2005. A judgment of paternity was entered in 2007. The parties stipulated to joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98052 - 2014-09-15
., born March 8, 2005. A judgment of paternity was entered in 2007. The parties stipulated to joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98052 - 2014-09-15