Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3391 - 3400 of 6436 for dr.
Search results 3391 - 3400 of 6436 for dr.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be examined by Drs. Deborah Collins and Robert Barahal to evaluate whether Stowe “is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701648 - 2023-09-12
be examined by Drs. Deborah Collins and Robert Barahal to evaluate whether Stowe “is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701648 - 2023-09-12
Armund M. Janto v. Monica L. Janto
witness. Dr. Marc J. Ackerman stated in his initial report: Unfortunately, this case brings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4525 - 2005-03-31
witness. Dr. Marc J. Ackerman stated in his initial report: Unfortunately, this case brings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4525 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 106
and that it was Wikenheiser who rotated Petzel’s bent leg to dislocate the hip joint after making surgical incisions. Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36894 - 2009-07-28
and that it was Wikenheiser who rotated Petzel’s bent leg to dislocate the hip joint after making surgical incisions. Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36894 - 2009-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P.
made to the DOC psychologists. Dr. Debra Anderson evaluated him during the intake process, and Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9674 - 2017-09-19
made to the DOC psychologists. Dr. Debra Anderson evaluated him during the intake process, and Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9674 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brian C. Painter v. Dentistry Examining Board
Painter’s third argument raises an issue of credibility. Painter argues that his expert, Dr. James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5578 - 2017-09-19
Painter’s third argument raises an issue of credibility. Painter argues that his expert, Dr. James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5578 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment dismissing their claim against Dr. Paul Jensen in a medical malpractice action after a jury found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35265 - 2009-01-20
a judgment dismissing their claim against Dr. Paul Jensen in a medical malpractice action after a jury found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35265 - 2009-01-20
State v. Raymond L. Matzker
testified that Dr. Charles Lodl, a psychologist described by counsel as defense-oriented, examined Matzker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8366 - 2005-03-31
testified that Dr. Charles Lodl, a psychologist described by counsel as defense-oriented, examined Matzker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8366 - 2005-03-31
Charlie Tate, Jr. v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin
was “temporary.” The medical records certainly do not support that testimony. Mr. Tate told Dr. John Watt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16331 - 2005-03-31
was “temporary.” The medical records certainly do not support that testimony. Mr. Tate told Dr. John Watt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16331 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Marlene Brown v. David G. Dibbell, M.D.
contributorily negligent in an informed consent suit she brought against Dr. David Dibbell and Dr. Steven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12800 - 2017-09-21
contributorily negligent in an informed consent suit she brought against Dr. David Dibbell and Dr. Steven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Dr. Charles Lodl prepared the assessment at the request of a lawyer who represented Matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186951 - 2017-09-21
that Dr. Charles Lodl prepared the assessment at the request of a lawyer who represented Matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186951 - 2017-09-21