Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3391 - 3400 of 19288 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 3391 - 3400 of 19288 for transfer by affidavit.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously permitted the County to file an affidavit with its reply brief in support of its summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263244 - 2020-06-04
erroneously permitted the County to file an affidavit with its reply brief in support of its summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263244 - 2020-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Thomas A. Drexler
and supporting affidavits, Drexler maintained that his plea in 1991 was defective because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5262 - 2017-09-19
and supporting affidavits, Drexler maintained that his plea in 1991 was defective because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5262 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas A. Drexler
. In the motion and supporting affidavits, Drexler maintained that his plea in 1991 was defective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5262 - 2005-03-31
. In the motion and supporting affidavits, Drexler maintained that his plea in 1991 was defective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affidavits. C.C. did not file a response. At the January 11 hearing, CC conceded that the first three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181450 - 2017-09-21
affidavits. C.C. did not file a response. At the January 11 hearing, CC conceded that the first three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181450 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Minko Lewis
for an evidentiary hearing, pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), to determine whether the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4021 - 2017-09-20
for an evidentiary hearing, pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), to determine whether the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4021 - 2017-09-20
Amber L. English v. Virgil Woodworth
of fact. If they do, we then examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether a prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15422 - 2005-03-31
of fact. If they do, we then examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether a prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15422 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the nature of the counterclaim, the case was transferred to circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79222 - 2014-09-15
of the nature of the counterclaim, the case was transferred to circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79222 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and counterclaim. Because of the nature of the counterclaim, the case was transferred to circuit court. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79222 - 2012-03-07
and counterclaim. Because of the nature of the counterclaim, the case was transferred to circuit court. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79222 - 2012-03-07
[PDF]
Thomas R. Leske v. John A. Leske
the claim. We turn to the affidavits submitted in support of the defendants' motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7719 - 2017-09-19
the claim. We turn to the affidavits submitted in support of the defendants' motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7719 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Milwaukee County submitted supporting affidavits. Hills, Hills Legal Group, and Progressive moved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197489 - 2017-10-04
and Milwaukee County submitted supporting affidavits. Hills, Hills Legal Group, and Progressive moved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197489 - 2017-10-04