Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33911 - 33920 of 64166 for records.
Search results 33911 - 33920 of 64166 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that further proceedings would lack arguable merit. Therefore, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112086 - 2017-09-21
review of the record, we conclude that further proceedings would lack arguable merit. Therefore, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112086 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Howard C. Carter
finding that Kestly’s demeanor demonstrated his impartiality is unsupported by the record. We could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4338 - 2017-09-19
finding that Kestly’s demeanor demonstrated his impartiality is unsupported by the record. We could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4338 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Farrell
competent. He requested that this evaluation be included in the record to support his request to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13933 - 2014-09-15
competent. He requested that this evaluation be included in the record to support his request to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13933 - 2014-09-15
State v. David M. Womble
dire that police officers were on the panel, and also knew that Womble had an extensive criminal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15294 - 2005-03-31
dire that police officers were on the panel, and also knew that Womble had an extensive criminal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15294 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
department of transportation (DOT) records, police verified Thimm’s address, which had been provided to DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143838 - 2015-07-07
department of transportation (DOT) records, police verified Thimm’s address, which had been provided to DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143838 - 2015-07-07
CA Blank Order
, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97417 - 2013-05-23
, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97417 - 2013-05-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to provide any record citation to support this assertion. This court need not consider arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987548 - 2025-07-24
to provide any record citation to support this assertion. This court need not consider arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987548 - 2025-07-24
W. George Bowring v. Wisconsin Divison of Transportation
a discretionary determination if the court applied the correct law to the facts of record and reached a decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11016 - 2005-03-31
a discretionary determination if the court applied the correct law to the facts of record and reached a decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11016 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric S. Fenz
the burden to “show some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence.” State v. Harris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4014 - 2005-03-31
the burden to “show some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence.” State v. Harris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4014 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are brought under WIS. STAT. § 74.37(3)(d). In such cases, we review the record from the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264673 - 2020-06-16
are brought under WIS. STAT. § 74.37(3)(d). In such cases, we review the record from the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264673 - 2020-06-16