Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33941 - 33950 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 33941 - 33950 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Brad A. Raddeman
prosecution of both offenses on due process and double jeopardy grounds. The trial court agreed with Raddeman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2157 - 2005-03-31
prosecution of both offenses on due process and double jeopardy grounds. The trial court agreed with Raddeman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2157 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John S. Bergmann
HISTORY ¶2 In 1990, Bergmann was convicted after trial of theft from a person, intimidation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14344 - 2014-09-15
HISTORY ¶2 In 1990, Bergmann was convicted after trial of theft from a person, intimidation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14344 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, claiming that Menke owed Cavalry the outstanding balance then due. ¶4 At trial in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024513 - 2025-10-16
, claiming that Menke owed Cavalry the outstanding balance then due. ¶4 At trial in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024513 - 2025-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the battery charge that he could have raised at trial, Banta waived the right to raise such a defense when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953294 - 2025-05-08
to the battery charge that he could have raised at trial, Banta waived the right to raise such a defense when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953294 - 2025-05-08
State v. Lamart C. Cammon
was appointed to represent Cammon. Shortly before a scheduled hearing, Cammon sent a letter to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14898 - 2005-03-31
was appointed to represent Cammon. Shortly before a scheduled hearing, Cammon sent a letter to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14898 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jay B. Stephany
the polygraph process to render Stephany’s inculpatory statement admissible. We agree with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12787 - 2005-03-31
the polygraph process to render Stephany’s inculpatory statement admissible. We agree with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12787 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry W. W.
that the trial court erred when it excluded certain military entitlements from Larry W.'s gross income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8734 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred when it excluded certain military entitlements from Larry W.'s gross income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8734 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason R. Brown
to challenge the lineup prior to or at trial. Therefore, we will not directly address that contention. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15155 - 2005-03-31
to challenge the lineup prior to or at trial. Therefore, we will not directly address that contention. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15155 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derrick Emerson
affirmed the trial court’s decision denying Emerson’s request to withdraw his plea.[2] ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31
affirmed the trial court’s decision denying Emerson’s request to withdraw his plea.[2] ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Golden
be reduced accordingly. The issue is whether the trial court properly found Golden to be a habitual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12905 - 2017-09-21
be reduced accordingly. The issue is whether the trial court properly found Golden to be a habitual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12905 - 2017-09-21