Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33951 - 33960 of 64775 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 33951 - 33960 of 64775 for divorce records/1000.
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107292 - 2014-01-28
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107292 - 2014-01-28
State v. Bernard L. Beyer
coerced a plea is not supported by any facts of record. Finally, the record discloses no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13499 - 2005-03-31
coerced a plea is not supported by any facts of record. Finally, the record discloses no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13499 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and the State’s response, any past or current evaluations in the record or other documents provided by the parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103314 - 2013-10-23
and the State’s response, any past or current evaluations in the record or other documents provided by the parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103314 - 2013-10-23
Rule Order
. 2. A written supplement to the record. (b) If the applicant does not request a hearing or file
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60735 - 2011-03-01
. 2. A written supplement to the record. (b) If the applicant does not request a hearing or file
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60735 - 2011-03-01
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record that Stewart “verbally acknowledged his understanding” that the court could exceed the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56193 - 2010-11-02
in the record that Stewart “verbally acknowledged his understanding” that the court could exceed the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56193 - 2010-11-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
award erroneously included $8,485.17 in profits. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610808 - 2023-01-18
award erroneously included $8,485.17 in profits. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610808 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and she has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436359 - 2021-10-05
to the no-merit report, and she has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436359 - 2021-10-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186053 - 2017-09-21
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186053 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, the Halls do not provide record citation for the September letter and we will not search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87850 - 2012-10-09
, the Halls do not provide record citation for the September letter and we will not search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87850 - 2012-10-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974805 - 2025-06-26
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974805 - 2025-06-26