Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33951 - 33960 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 33951 - 33960 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
at sentencing—as well as its additional statements in its written order—demonstrate that it complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112199 - 2014-05-12
at sentencing—as well as its additional statements in its written order—demonstrate that it complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112199 - 2014-05-12
State v. Tomas R. Payano-Roman
of this statement. Thus, we again conclude that the State’s argument fails. ¶16 Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18072 - 2005-07-06
of this statement. Thus, we again conclude that the State’s argument fails. ¶16 Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18072 - 2005-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
could view Stofflet’s statement about a stalker as a quickly made-up and poor excuse for obviously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124310 - 2014-10-15
could view Stofflet’s statement about a stalker as a quickly made-up and poor excuse for obviously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124310 - 2014-10-15
Frontsheet
for failing to periodically review his trust account bank statements, cancelled checks, and other records
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77946 - 2012-02-08
for failing to periodically review his trust account bank statements, cancelled checks, and other records
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77946 - 2012-02-08
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan V. Manke
attorney affirmed Manke’s statements. The attorney testified that Manke No. 98-2545-CR 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14452 - 2017-09-21
attorney affirmed Manke’s statements. The attorney testified that Manke No. 98-2545-CR 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14452 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in this matter, and their statements of issues group these claims together into identical formulations of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
in this matter, and their statements of issues group these claims together into identical formulations of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, as the basis of Nico’s claim is that circuit court’s statement on the burden of proof or standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844616 - 2024-09-04
, as the basis of Nico’s claim is that circuit court’s statement on the burden of proof or standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844616 - 2024-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
In a motion to dismiss, “[f]actual assertions are evidenced by statements that describe: ‘who, what, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037577 - 2025-11-18
In a motion to dismiss, “[f]actual assertions are evidenced by statements that describe: ‘who, what, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037577 - 2025-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
that, especially in view of the District’s statement that it purchased the property to preserve it, its claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60905 - 2011-03-15
that, especially in view of the District’s statement that it purchased the property to preserve it, its claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60905 - 2011-03-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of rights form completed by Harris includes an “X” by the statement, “I understand that by entering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86900 - 2012-09-11
of rights form completed by Harris includes an “X” by the statement, “I understand that by entering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86900 - 2012-09-11