Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33981 - 33990 of 63485 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33981 - 33990 of 63485 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and as a repeater, or to challenge the order denying Underland’s postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756081 - 2024-01-30
, and as a repeater, or to challenge the order denying Underland’s postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756081 - 2024-01-30
Armando Trevino v. Ladd & Milaeger
evidence in opposition to the motion for summary judgment that he is actually innocent of the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3972 - 2005-03-31
evidence in opposition to the motion for summary judgment that he is actually innocent of the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3972 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven T. Miller
that a motion to withdraw Miller's plea would fail because the plea hearing transcript establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9136 - 2017-09-19
that a motion to withdraw Miller's plea would fail because the plea hearing transcript establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9136 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rollin B. Kovars
intoxicated, second offense. Kovars contends the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4706 - 2005-03-31
intoxicated, second offense. Kovars contends the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4706 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Buck
motion for postconviction relief. The issue on appeal is whether Buck was denied effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15453 - 2017-09-21
motion for postconviction relief. The issue on appeal is whether Buck was denied effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15453 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
granting in part and denying in part his postconviction motion. He argues that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184080 - 2017-09-21
granting in part and denying in part his postconviction motion. He argues that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184080 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and as a repeater, or to challenge the order denying Underland’s postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756081 - 2024-01-30
, and as a repeater, or to challenge the order denying Underland’s postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756081 - 2024-01-30
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company v. John McClellan
. Prac. Series) (1994). A motion for an order compelling discovery should be filed with the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9164 - 2005-03-31
. Prac. Series) (1994). A motion for an order compelling discovery should be filed with the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9164 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04).[1] The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27385 - 2006-12-11
motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04).[1] The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27385 - 2006-12-11
State v. Robert L. Dumas
that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress[1] on the theory that his arrest and the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13305 - 2005-03-31
that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress[1] on the theory that his arrest and the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13305 - 2005-03-31