Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33981 - 33990 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33981 - 33990 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Cynthia J. Vernon
after a motion for reconsideration of the circuit court’s previous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14295 - 2014-09-15
after a motion for reconsideration of the circuit court’s previous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14295 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Terrence Stokes, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Stokes claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245020 - 2019-08-13
). Terrence Stokes, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Stokes claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245020 - 2019-08-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for relief from the aggregate forty-year term
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684095 - 2023-08-01
, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for relief from the aggregate forty-year term
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684095 - 2023-08-01
[PDF]
Gelbert Martinez v. Jefferson Insurance
was disputed as to Jefferson’s motion for summary judgment and properly denied that motion. When the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11382 - 2017-09-19
was disputed as to Jefferson’s motion for summary judgment and properly denied that motion. When the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11382 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Brian E.F.
At the time of the incident, Brian was fifteen and Amanda was fourteen. Brian brought a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15099 - 2017-09-21
At the time of the incident, Brian was fifteen and Amanda was fourteen. Brian brought a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15099 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
id. at 4. We subsequently denied his motion for reconsideration. ¶3 Funches next returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98457 - 2014-09-15
id. at 4. We subsequently denied his motion for reconsideration. ¶3 Funches next returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98457 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a motion to dismiss arguing that Shelton’s action was barred based on the doctrine of claim preclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
a motion to dismiss arguing that Shelton’s action was barred based on the doctrine of claim preclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
State v. Richard V. Stiglitz
conduct charges. Stiglitz objected to the motion because the State failed to make the motion within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2983 - 2017-09-19
conduct charges. Stiglitz objected to the motion because the State failed to make the motion within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2983 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a summary judgment motion, arguing that dismissal was required because Jeffrey lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96022 - 2014-09-15
filed a summary judgment motion, arguing that dismissal was required because Jeffrey lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96022 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
an order of the circuit court entered November 11, 2008, granting the postconviction motion of John C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46452 - 2014-09-15
an order of the circuit court entered November 11, 2008, granting the postconviction motion of John C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46452 - 2014-09-15