Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33991 - 34000 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 33991 - 34000 of 98406 for court records search online.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
reviewed the Record and conclude that there would be no arguable merit to any of the court’s other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926075 - 2025-03-12
reviewed the Record and conclude that there would be no arguable merit to any of the court’s other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926075 - 2025-03-12
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
reviewed the Record and conclude that there would be no arguable merit to any of the court’s other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926075 - 2025-03-12
reviewed the Record and conclude that there would be no arguable merit to any of the court’s other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926075 - 2025-03-12
[PDF]
State v. Matthew D.
that the other two offenders, who had prior records, were both being waived into adult court. Tracey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13399 - 2017-09-21
that the other two offenders, who had prior records, were both being waived into adult court. Tracey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13399 - 2017-09-21
Waushara County v. Susan G.
in her mind. The court understood the purpose of supplementing the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9871 - 2005-03-31
in her mind. The court understood the purpose of supplementing the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9871 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Waushara County v. Susan G.
cause in open court or during a telephone conference under s. 807.13 on the record and only for so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9871 - 2017-09-19
cause in open court or during a telephone conference under s. 807.13 on the record and only for so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9871 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Conrad Hagenkord
” is also rejected. Although the record does reflect that the trial court used the wrong term, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12256 - 2017-09-21
” is also rejected. Although the record does reflect that the trial court used the wrong term, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12256 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” That is the extent of the circuit court’s treatment of the issue in the record originally supplied to us on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31382 - 2014-09-15
.” That is the extent of the circuit court’s treatment of the issue in the record originally supplied to us on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31382 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
him. Based on the hearing testimony, and the circuit court’s review of a video recording
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169726 - 2017-09-21
him. Based on the hearing testimony, and the circuit court’s review of a video recording
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169726 - 2017-09-21
Dawn Alt v. Richard S. Cline, M.D.
examine the record to determine whether the facts support the trial court's decision. See Martin v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8006 - 2005-03-31
examine the record to determine whether the facts support the trial court's decision. See Martin v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8006 - 2005-03-31
State v. Antonio Valtierrez
N.W.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1992) (“appellate court’s review is confined to those parts of the record made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5517 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1992) (“appellate court’s review is confined to those parts of the record made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5517 - 2005-03-31