Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 341 - 350 of 556 for widths.

[PDF] AKG Real Estate, LLC v. Patrick J. Kosterman
. This easement was sixty-six feet in width. The parties intended the expansion to allow for conversion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7251 - 2017-09-20

AKG Real Estate, LLC v. Patrick J. Kosterman
. This easement was sixty-six feet in width. The parties intended the expansion to allow for conversion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7251 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph A. Yanske
: (a) An unobstructed width of at least 15 feet upon the roadway of such highway must be left opposite such standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21053 - 2006-01-25

[PDF] Michael Wendt v. John H. Blazek
Lake on and over a strip of land 15 feet in width lying parallel to and immediately East of the West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3007 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. § 340.01(22). This section states that a “highway” is “the entire width between the boundary lines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57071 - 2010-11-23

August E. Fabyan v. Town of Delafield
feet minimum width and buildings on such lots to be set back from the lake 150 feet. See Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16190 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bruce A. Pickens
roadways of sufficient width the operator of a vehicle shall drive on the right half of the roadway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13307 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Roland F. Sarko v. Examining Board of Architects
regarding boundaries, bearings, road width, north reference, lot area, curve information, reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3892 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Joseph A. Yanske
width of at least 15 feet upon the roadway of such highway must be left opposite such standing vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21053 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] August E. Fabyan v. Town of Delafield
zoning ordinance requires lake district lots to be 100 feet minimum width and buildings on such lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16190 - 2017-09-21