Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3401 - 3410 of 17371 for Cost.

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leslie J. Webster
foreclosure cases Webster subsequently sought and was awarded fees and costs for his services as trustee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17374 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Milwaukee Regional Medical Center v. City of Wauwatosa
that the projected daycare facility have “a minimum construction cost of $400,000,” and that construction not start
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25596 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
, Inc., has appealed from a judgment awarding damages and costs of $392,267.86 to Cornerstone Design
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29335 - 2014-09-15

Milwaukee Regional Medical Center v. City of Wauwatosa
The lease required that the projected daycare facility have “a minimum construction cost of $400,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25596 - 2010-05-03

COURT OF APPEALS
awarding damages and costs of $392,267.86 to Cornerstone Design, Ltd. Cornerstone has cross-appealed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29335 - 2007-06-12

Michael H. Baarts v. Barbara Hammerberg
could have remedied the problem. Here, the estimated cost of creating a new driveway to traverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9545 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
amount as “restitution” instead of a cost. A “Restitution Information” form submitted to the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216487 - 2018-07-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is entitled to an award of double costs or additional interest, the circuit court erred by dismissing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724650 - 2023-11-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is entitled to an award of double costs or additional interest, the circuit court erred by dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724650 - 2023-11-07

State v. Nathaniel A. Lindell
to sanction the district attorney and award Lindell costs; and that the trial court erred in refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5211 - 2005-03-31