Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3401 - 3410 of 63708 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3401 - 3410 of 63708 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
Russell’s motion to dismiss based on an improper chain of custody. The DNA evidence was the only evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53135 - 2014-09-15
Russell’s motion to dismiss based on an improper chain of custody. The DNA evidence was the only evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53135 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Sommers Estates Company v. City of New Berlin
SOMMERS ESTATES COMPANY, a joint venture, JOHN CARR, individually and as general partner of KATERI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9419 - 2017-09-19
SOMMERS ESTATES COMPANY, a joint venture, JOHN CARR, individually and as general partner of KATERI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9419 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
is found in a place immediately accessible to the accused and subject to his exclusive or joint dominion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32015 - 2008-03-05
is found in a place immediately accessible to the accused and subject to his exclusive or joint dominion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32015 - 2008-03-05
Sommers Estates Company v. City of New Berlin
SOMMERS ESTATES COMPANY, a joint venture, JOHN CARR, individually and as general partner of KATERI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9419 - 2005-03-31
SOMMERS ESTATES COMPANY, a joint venture, JOHN CARR, individually and as general partner of KATERI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9419 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
be entitled to any separate property that that party contributed to joint property, and that the remaining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110450 - 2014-04-14
be entitled to any separate property that that party contributed to joint property, and that the remaining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110450 - 2014-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction. The Honorable Jonathan D. Watts entered the order denying Grant’s motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155727 - 2017-09-21
of conviction. The Honorable Jonathan D. Watts entered the order denying Grant’s motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155727 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. ¶2 Wren argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570533 - 2022-09-27
postconviction motion. ¶2 Wren argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570533 - 2022-09-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Matthew Allen appeals a postconviction order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47589 - 2014-09-15
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Matthew Allen appeals a postconviction order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47589 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Matthew Allen appeals a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence credit. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47589 - 2010-03-03
. Matthew Allen appeals a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence credit. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47589 - 2010-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS
motions. The court determined that Thomas was not in custody when he made his inculpatory statements, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105183 - 2013-12-10
motions. The court determined that Thomas was not in custody when he made his inculpatory statements, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105183 - 2013-12-10