Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3401 - 3410 of 30059 for de.
Search results 3401 - 3410 of 30059 for de.
Sally J. Schultz-Fuhrman v. James R. Fuhrman
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26285 - 2006-08-28
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26285 - 2006-08-28
Gordon P. Ralph v. Bank One Wisconsin
relief can be granted is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶10 Ralph
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4923 - 2005-03-31
relief can be granted is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶10 Ralph
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4923 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 6
motion. Heartland appeals. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review de novo the circuit court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89689 - 2014-09-15
motion. Heartland appeals. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review de novo the circuit court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89689 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Ray A. Peterson
and sought a trial de novo in the circuit court. The circuit court also found him guilty and Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2255 - 2017-09-19
and sought a trial de novo in the circuit court. The circuit court also found him guilty and Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2255 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Joseph Ermenc v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
). We review the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13665 - 2017-09-21
). We review the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13665 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
then requested a trial de novo before the circuit court. Weinstein renewed his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34265 - 2014-09-15
then requested a trial de novo before the circuit court. Weinstein renewed his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34265 - 2014-09-15
James Munroe v. Patrick D. Braatz
of the trial court's decision is de novo: we independently examine the sufficiency of the custodian's reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9679 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court's decision is de novo: we independently examine the sufficiency of the custodian's reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9679 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 143
¶5 We review summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54668 - 2010-10-26
¶5 We review summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54668 - 2010-10-26
2008 WI APP 139
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶11. ¶11 The Osborns’ argument fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33627 - 2008-09-23
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶11. ¶11 The Osborns’ argument fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33627 - 2008-09-23
State v. Roger L. Stank
of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. Id. at ¶2. The relevant inquiry is “whether the area in question is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4442 - 2005-03-31
of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. Id. at ¶2. The relevant inquiry is “whether the area in question is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4442 - 2005-03-31