Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3401 - 3410 of 24429 for extending.
Search results 3401 - 3410 of 24429 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). 1 We now reject the no-merit report, dismiss the appeal, and extend the time to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169244 - 2017-09-21
). 1 We now reject the no-merit report, dismiss the appeal, and extend the time to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169244 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of five years of initial confinement and six years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841119 - 2024-08-27
of five years of initial confinement and six years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841119 - 2024-08-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. Karoses subsequently filed a postconviction motion in the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722392 - 2023-11-01
years of extended supervision. Karoses subsequently filed a postconviction motion in the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722392 - 2023-11-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and two years’ extended supervision.3 This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983042 - 2025-07-16
confinement and two years’ extended supervision.3 This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983042 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and 17 years of extended supervision. Bluhm moved for resentencing, arguing that his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798586 - 2024-05-09
confinement and 17 years of extended supervision. Bluhm moved for resentencing, arguing that his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798586 - 2024-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2021CF475 of five years’ initial confinement followed by five years’ extended supervision on each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973589 - 2025-06-24
No. 2021CF475 of five years’ initial confinement followed by five years’ extended supervision on each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973589 - 2025-06-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
restrictive placement presently appropriate and I’ll sign the order extending the protective placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888119 - 2024-12-12
restrictive placement presently appropriate and I’ll sign the order extending the protective placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888119 - 2024-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was whether Schultz would be eligible to petition for extended supervision and, if so, on what date. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574695 - 2022-10-06
was whether Schultz would be eligible to petition for extended supervision and, if so, on what date. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574695 - 2022-10-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years of extended supervision on both the stalking and the threatening to communicate derogatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143668 - 2017-09-21
years of extended supervision on both the stalking and the threatening to communicate derogatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143668 - 2017-09-21
Robert Derks v. Town of Seven Mile Creek
(1899) (right-of-way could not have extended beyond trees on one side of the road and stump on other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4126 - 2005-03-31
(1899) (right-of-way could not have extended beyond trees on one side of the road and stump on other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4126 - 2005-03-31