Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3401 - 3410 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 3401 - 3410 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the evidence at his trial was insufficient to prove one of the elements of the crime for which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632219 - 2023-03-14
that the evidence at his trial was insufficient to prove one of the elements of the crime for which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632219 - 2023-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS
the resulting self incriminating custodial statement used against him [or her] at trial,” means that Mack S.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32345 - 2008-04-07
the resulting self incriminating custodial statement used against him [or her] at trial,” means that Mack S.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32345 - 2008-04-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2015AP1315 2015AP1565 3 Rydlands now appeal, alleging that the trial court made several errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186559 - 2017-09-21
. 2015AP1315 2015AP1565 3 Rydlands now appeal, alleging that the trial court made several errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186559 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35584 - 2014-09-15
for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35584 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daryl M. Knighten
to § 943.32(1)(a), Stats.[1] On appeal, Knighten raises the following issues: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11401 - 2005-03-31
to § 943.32(1)(a), Stats.[1] On appeal, Knighten raises the following issues: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11401 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sebastian "Frank" Bustamante
., 1977,[1] after a jury trial. Bustamante argues the trial court improperly admitted other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9616 - 2005-03-31
., 1977,[1] after a jury trial. Bustamante argues the trial court improperly admitted other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9616 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daryl M. Knighten
to § 943.32(1)(a), STATS. 1 On appeal, Knighten raises the following issues: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11401 - 2017-09-19
to § 943.32(1)(a), STATS. 1 On appeal, Knighten raises the following issues: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11401 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Lisimba Love
for a Machner hearing and for resentencing. 2 Love claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3765 - 2017-09-19
for a Machner hearing and for resentencing. 2 Love claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3765 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lisimba Love
claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective because she failed to object to the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3765 - 2005-03-31
claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective because she failed to object to the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3765 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because it failed to consider the best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249806 - 2019-11-12
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because it failed to consider the best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249806 - 2019-11-12