Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34001 - 34010 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 34001 - 34010 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Eugene F. Line
of a trial court’s sentencing discretion. Id. The court concluded that “a statement by the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13964 - 2005-03-31
of a trial court’s sentencing discretion. Id. The court concluded that “a statement by the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13964 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry G. Edwards
. Consequences are, he walks. Motion granted." Edwards argues that these statements make clear
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16577 - 2017-09-21
. Consequences are, he walks. Motion granted." Edwards argues that these statements make clear
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16577 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan V. Manke
attorney affirmed Manke’s statements. The attorney testified that Manke No. 98-2545-CR 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14452 - 2017-09-21
attorney affirmed Manke’s statements. The attorney testified that Manke No. 98-2545-CR 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14452 - 2017-09-21
Allan Hoffmann v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
.” Even assuming WEPCO has accurately characterized Bodman’s report, this statement does not show a misuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3112 - 2005-03-31
.” Even assuming WEPCO has accurately characterized Bodman’s report, this statement does not show a misuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3112 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2024AP1724 7 opening and closing statements by the State and for not impeaching or objecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040799 - 2025-11-25
No. 2024AP1724 7 opening and closing statements by the State and for not impeaching or objecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040799 - 2025-11-25
State v. Tomas R. Payano-Roman
of this statement. Thus, we again conclude that the State’s argument fails. ¶16 Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18072 - 2005-07-06
of this statement. Thus, we again conclude that the State’s argument fails. ¶16 Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18072 - 2005-07-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, at the scheduled sentencing hearing, the victim’s mother provided an oral statement, and Pollari presented his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106306 - 2017-09-21
, at the scheduled sentencing hearing, the victim’s mother provided an oral statement, and Pollari presented his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106306 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
report addresses several instances of hearsay testimony as to the victim’s statements to others
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108289 - 2014-02-18
report addresses several instances of hearsay testimony as to the victim’s statements to others
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108289 - 2014-02-18
CA Blank Order
and share alike” in the enjoyment of the whole property [.]” [5] A more modern statement of this standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123649 - 2014-10-19
and share alike” in the enjoyment of the whole property [.]” [5] A more modern statement of this standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123649 - 2014-10-19
[PDF]
State v. Arturo Melendez
.” It is apparent from the context of her statements at the time of sentencing that the district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12133 - 2017-09-21
.” It is apparent from the context of her statements at the time of sentencing that the district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12133 - 2017-09-21