Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34011 - 34020 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34011 - 34020 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Brian E.F.
was fifteen and Amanda was fourteen. Brian brought a motion to dismiss based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15099 - 2005-03-31
was fifteen and Amanda was fourteen. Brian brought a motion to dismiss based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15099 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gemma L. Kitzman
court’s denial of her motion to dismiss or suppress. Specifically, Kitzman argues that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10771 - 2017-09-20
court’s denial of her motion to dismiss or suppress. Specifically, Kitzman argues that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10771 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the following facts relevant to Bentdahl’s motion to dismiss the refusal charge. Bentdahl was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90208 - 2014-09-15
to the following facts relevant to Bentdahl’s motion to dismiss the refusal charge. Bentdahl was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90208 - 2014-09-15
State v. Antonio Q. Cruz
. Cruz appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3359 - 2005-03-31
. Cruz appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3359 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
] On appeal, Engen argues that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion in limine seeking to exclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148248 - 2015-09-02
] On appeal, Engen argues that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion in limine seeking to exclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148248 - 2015-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion.[1] Because the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86884 - 2012-09-10
his postconviction motion.[1] Because the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86884 - 2012-09-10
CA Blank Order
upon his no contest plea after the trial court denied his motion to suppress.[1] Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110217 - 2014-04-15
upon his no contest plea after the trial court denied his motion to suppress.[1] Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110217 - 2014-04-15
State v. Argyle L. Hagen
). Prior to entering the plea, Hagen filed a suppression motion, challenging the underlying arrest. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16297 - 2005-03-31
). Prior to entering the plea, Hagen filed a suppression motion, challenging the underlying arrest. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, by counsel, appeals his judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707889 - 2023-09-28
, by counsel, appeals his judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707889 - 2023-09-28
COURT OF APPEALS
for the investigatory stop. The circuit court held an evidentiary hearing on Hoffman’s motion, but before rendering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71233 - 2011-09-26
for the investigatory stop. The circuit court held an evidentiary hearing on Hoffman’s motion, but before rendering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71233 - 2011-09-26