Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34021 - 34030 of 58937 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 34021 - 34030 of 58937 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Gary R. Malkmus
consecutive sentences. There is no evidence to support Malkmus’s claim that he deserves sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26332 - 2006-09-05
consecutive sentences. There is no evidence to support Malkmus’s claim that he deserves sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26332 - 2006-09-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
overturned or vacated, and he did not request resentencing. 2 The remedy for Morales’ claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142464 - 2017-09-21
overturned or vacated, and he did not request resentencing. 2 The remedy for Morales’ claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142464 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Brown County v. Grey B.
with the premise upon which Grey’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based, the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15726 - 2017-09-21
with the premise upon which Grey’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based, the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15726 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Gary D. Gary v. David H. Schwarz
violation. See id. By conceding that he had absconded, Gary relinquished any claim he may have had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6933 - 2017-09-20
violation. See id. By conceding that he had absconded, Gary relinquished any claim he may have had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6933 - 2017-09-20
State v. David S. Frederick
conclude that, as a matter of judicial efficiency, it is more expedient to address Frederick’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11535 - 2005-03-31
conclude that, as a matter of judicial efficiency, it is more expedient to address Frederick’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11535 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas K. Uhde
the case, the State submitted a brief reversing its position on Uhde’s burglary misstatement claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5918 - 2017-09-19
the case, the State submitted a brief reversing its position on Uhde’s burglary misstatement claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5918 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Comments on Supreme Court rule 16-05 - Attorney Randal J. Brotherhood
Dockets for Large Claim Business and Commercial Cases." Please file-stamp the enclosed copy
/supreme/docs/1605commentsbrotherhood.pdf - 2017-01-11
Dockets for Large Claim Business and Commercial Cases." Please file-stamp the enclosed copy
/supreme/docs/1605commentsbrotherhood.pdf - 2017-01-11
State v. David W. Pender
in a light most favorable to Pender, and concludes that it does not establish grounds to claim a defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9739 - 2005-03-31
in a light most favorable to Pender, and concludes that it does not establish grounds to claim a defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9739 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
is sitting by special assignment pursuant to the Judicial Exchange Program. [2] Taylor raised this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2298 - 2005-03-31
is sitting by special assignment pursuant to the Judicial Exchange Program. [2] Taylor raised this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2298 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
necessarily included disruptive conduct, which Knapp claimed it would. There is nothing improper about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7752 - 2005-03-31
necessarily included disruptive conduct, which Knapp claimed it would. There is nothing improper about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7752 - 2005-03-31