Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34021 - 34030 of 64755 for b's.

State v. Daniel E. La Fave
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8696 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daniel E. La Fave
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8695 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ronald L. Baskin
.—Judgment and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15891 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael F. Levickis
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] The State also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7414 - 2005-03-31

State v. Glenn Eric Rhodes
will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] As Rhodes recognizes in his brief on this appeal, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14158 - 2005-03-31

Doris M. Hoopingarner v. Town of Lakewood
). By the Cour..—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16279 - 2005-03-31

State v. Scott A. Flower
. In simple terms, A, B, C and D nowhere lead to X. ¶8 We leave this case by stating the obvious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21116 - 2006-01-31

Dennis M. Makeeff v. Eau Claire County
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11830 - 2005-03-31

John E. Pickel v. John Harr, Jr.
. By the Court—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11831 - 2005-03-31

August Table of Unpublished Opinions
. 07-06-2005 Reversed in part and remanded with directions 2004AP001668 Lane B
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19617 - 2005-09-12