Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34031 - 34040 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 34031 - 34040 of 98406 for court records search online.
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Kimberly A.M.
was made. ¶6 During the dispositional hearing, the trial court made a record of the interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4185 - 2005-03-31
was made. ¶6 During the dispositional hearing, the trial court made a record of the interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4185 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Kimberly A.M.
was made. ¶6 During the dispositional hearing, the trial court made a record of the interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4187 - 2005-03-31
was made. ¶6 During the dispositional hearing, the trial court made a record of the interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4187 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Kimberly A.M.
was made. ¶6 During the dispositional hearing, the trial court made a record of the interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4188 - 2005-03-31
was made. ¶6 During the dispositional hearing, the trial court made a record of the interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4188 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Kimberly A.M.
was made. ¶6 During the dispositional hearing, the trial court made a record of the interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4186 - 2005-03-31
was made. ¶6 During the dispositional hearing, the trial court made a record of the interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4186 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Xavier Lorenzo Brown
, the trial court stated that “[a]lthough no mention was made of [Love]'s prior record or record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9491 - 2017-09-19
, the trial court stated that “[a]lthough no mention was made of [Love]'s prior record or record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9491 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ventae Parrow
and considered all of Parrow’s arguments but the trial court did not state on the record its reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14988 - 2017-09-21
and considered all of Parrow’s arguments but the trial court did not state on the record its reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14988 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ventae Parrow
and considered all of Parrow’s arguments but the trial court did not state on the record its reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14987 - 2017-09-21
and considered all of Parrow’s arguments but the trial court did not state on the record its reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14987 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dane Co. DHS v. Todd S.
in the record captioned “CHIPS Dane County Circuit Court Juvenile Judge Substitution/Self-Disqualification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25107 - 2017-09-21
in the record captioned “CHIPS Dane County Circuit Court Juvenile Judge Substitution/Self-Disqualification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25107 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Penny M. Z. v. John D. R.
determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12169 - 2017-09-21
determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12169 - 2017-09-21
Penny M. Z. v. John D. R.
of that testimony, which is uncontradicted in the record, we are satisfied that, in this trial to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12169 - 2005-03-31
of that testimony, which is uncontradicted in the record, we are satisfied that, in this trial to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12169 - 2005-03-31