Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34031 - 34040 of 68527 for did.
Search results 34031 - 34040 of 68527 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and viewed videotape footage from the surveillance camera. In addition, counsel did specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77320 - 2014-09-15
and viewed videotape footage from the surveillance camera. In addition, counsel did specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77320 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Sisakhone S. Douangmala
that the State did not furnish him an interpreter. The trial court denied both claims without an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15978 - 2017-09-21
that the State did not furnish him an interpreter. The trial court denied both claims without an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15978 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John Konaha
no recollection of R.C.’s testimony. He did, however, testify about his tactics during closing arguments: I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4696 - 2017-09-19
no recollection of R.C.’s testimony. He did, however, testify about his tactics during closing arguments: I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4696 - 2017-09-19
State v. Spriggie Hensley, Jr.
points out that although Escalona-Naranjo did allege ineffective assistance of counsel as a claim, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13158 - 2005-03-31
points out that although Escalona-Naranjo did allege ineffective assistance of counsel as a claim, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13158 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher D. Rose
of innocent behavior). ¶10 Rose next argues that Officer Hale did not have probable cause to arrest Rose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7238 - 2005-03-31
of innocent behavior). ¶10 Rose next argues that Officer Hale did not have probable cause to arrest Rose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not in the warehouse business and did not own any storage facilities. No. 2007AP997 5 its insured has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32764 - 2014-09-15
was not in the warehouse business and did not own any storage facilities. No. 2007AP997 5 its insured has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32764 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jerry D. Gragg
the vehicle while intoxicated—did not provide sufficient probable cause to arrest him. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7633 - 2005-03-31
the vehicle while intoxicated—did not provide sufficient probable cause to arrest him. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7633 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derrick L. McCree
his motion for sentence modification. Because we conclude that the circuit court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21118 - 2006-01-30
his motion for sentence modification. Because we conclude that the circuit court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21118 - 2006-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
court denied his motion to suppress evidence.[2] Brandl argues that the arresting officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123386 - 2014-10-08
court denied his motion to suppress evidence.[2] Brandl argues that the arresting officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123386 - 2014-10-08
CA Blank Order
no bearing on Vaughn’s assertion that he did not have the correct information when making his decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143006 - 2015-06-16
no bearing on Vaughn’s assertion that he did not have the correct information when making his decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143006 - 2015-06-16