Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34031 - 34040 of 57201 for id.
Search results 34031 - 34040 of 57201 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
must determine whether the new factor justifies modification of the sentence. Id. at 546
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30580 - 2007-10-15
must determine whether the new factor justifies modification of the sentence. Id. at 546
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30580 - 2007-10-15
State v. Thomas C. Owens
the court finds there was sufficient reason for failing to raise the claim earlier. Id. at 185. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25529 - 2006-06-14
the court finds there was sufficient reason for failing to raise the claim earlier. Id. at 185. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25529 - 2006-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS
claims”; and (6) recovery would enter into “‘a field that has no sensible or just stopping point.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144920 - 2015-07-28
claims”; and (6) recovery would enter into “‘a field that has no sensible or just stopping point.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144920 - 2015-07-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the hearing within twenty-one days.” Id. at 423. However, the relevant administrative code provision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132791 - 2017-09-21
the hearing within twenty-one days.” Id. at 423. However, the relevant administrative code provision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132791 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Barbara Ann Villwock v. Robert M. Villwock
for the circuit court. See id. Although the end result was that each party had a nearly equal disposable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11577 - 2017-09-19
for the circuit court. See id. Although the end result was that each party had a nearly equal disposable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11577 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
during the trial. Id., ¶23. On review, our supreme court observed that case law is divided about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47128 - 2014-09-15
during the trial. Id., ¶23. On review, our supreme court observed that case law is divided about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47128 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and assist at the time of the proceedings. Id., ¶31. A trial court’s competency determination should
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138093 - 2017-09-21
and assist at the time of the proceedings. Id., ¶31. A trial court’s competency determination should
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138093 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a “sufficient reason” for not previously raising an issue. See id. at 682, 556 N.W.2d at 139. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65587 - 2011-06-13
a “sufficient reason” for not previously raising an issue. See id. at 682, 556 N.W.2d at 139. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65587 - 2011-06-13
COURT OF APPEALS
, 264 Wis. 2d 765, 663 N.W.2d 358. The controlling standard is the totality of the circumstances. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66710 - 2011-06-28
, 264 Wis. 2d 765, 663 N.W.2d 358. The controlling standard is the totality of the circumstances. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66710 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the “nonpetitioning parent.” Id. WISCONSIN STAT. § 786.36(1m)(b)—the provision implicitly cited by the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237565 - 2019-03-20
the “nonpetitioning parent.” Id. WISCONSIN STAT. § 786.36(1m)(b)—the provision implicitly cited by the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237565 - 2019-03-20