Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34031 - 34040 of 56178 for so.
Search results 34031 - 34040 of 56178 for so.
State v. Gerald Kasian
on October 6, 1992, and December 7, 1992.[2] In response, Kasian’s counsel stated: Mr. Kasian has had so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10209 - 2005-03-31
on October 6, 1992, and December 7, 1992.[2] In response, Kasian’s counsel stated: Mr. Kasian has had so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10209 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hazard in this case was so clear and absolute, and so certain to cause injury, as to constitute a known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647401 - 2023-04-25
hazard in this case was so clear and absolute, and so certain to cause injury, as to constitute a known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647401 - 2023-04-25
State v. William L. Morford
, is so insufficient in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31
, is so insufficient in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Mary had made little progress in doing so since Grace was removed from Mary’s home in 2019
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542774 - 2022-07-19
Mary had made little progress in doing so since Grace was removed from Mary’s home in 2019
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542774 - 2022-07-19
State v. Douglas A. Lisney
conclude that the prosecutor’s closing argument “so infect[ed] the trial with unfairness as to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3179 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the prosecutor’s closing argument “so infect[ed] the trial with unfairness as to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3179 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Denis L.R.
prior to a trial court ruling on the matter. To do so would be to issue an advisory opinion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6153 - 2017-09-19
prior to a trial court ruling on the matter. To do so would be to issue an advisory opinion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6153 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
), 809.10(1)(e). Johnson did not do so. Her notice of appeal filed on April 4, 2007, relates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31873 - 2014-09-15
), 809.10(1)(e). Johnson did not do so. Her notice of appeal filed on April 4, 2007, relates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31873 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Scott Elvers
the Hampton violation. See Plank, 699 N.W.2d 235, ¶7. In doing so, this court noted that Plank had signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19978 - 2017-09-21
the Hampton violation. See Plank, 699 N.W.2d 235, ¶7. In doing so, this court noted that Plank had signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19978 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven E. Carr
to the state and the conviction, is so lacking in probative value and force” that no reasonable jury “could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11433 - 2017-09-19
to the state and the conviction, is so lacking in probative value and force” that no reasonable jury “could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11433 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark L. Auger
-finding function. See id. Auger did not raise this claim in the trial court, so this court could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7123 - 2005-03-31
-finding function. See id. Auger did not raise this claim in the trial court, so this court could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7123 - 2005-03-31