Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34041 - 34050 of 40255 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 34041 - 34050 of 40255 for financial disclosure statements.
State v. Eugene F. Line
of a trial court’s sentencing discretion. Id. The court concluded that “a statement by the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13964 - 2005-03-31
of a trial court’s sentencing discretion. Id. The court concluded that “a statement by the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13964 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at will upon request unless he is determined by the treatment director to be dangerous and a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=715815 - 2023-10-17
at will upon request unless he is determined by the treatment director to be dangerous and a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=715815 - 2023-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS
listed in the original approval.” Like the 2003 decision, the 2005 decision included statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48497 - 2010-03-31
listed in the original approval.” Like the 2003 decision, the 2005 decision included statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48497 - 2010-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
that the minimal statement on the judgment of conviction cannot be construed as a written order denying bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12127 - 2017-09-21
that the minimal statement on the judgment of conviction cannot be construed as a written order denying bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12127 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John J.A. Reuter v. Covenant Healthcare System, Inc.
court’s actual statement. No. 99-2380 7 ¶14 Covenant maintains that Reuter’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15967 - 2017-09-21
court’s actual statement. No. 99-2380 7 ¶14 Covenant maintains that Reuter’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15967 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert Vargas
and statements made during plea negotiations. See §§ 904.08 and 904.10, STATS. Yet we conclude that the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8463 - 2017-09-19
and statements made during plea negotiations. See §§ 904.08 and 904.10, STATS. Yet we conclude that the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8463 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Chris C. Lichtenberg
it accepts Lichtenberg’s statement of facts. No. 02-2300-CR 3 ¶4 On June 27, 2001, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5602 - 2017-09-19
it accepts Lichtenberg’s statement of facts. No. 02-2300-CR 3 ¶4 On June 27, 2001, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5602 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
United Heartland, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
an inaccurate history given to them by Amaihe. ¶16 Dr. Karr’s report sets forth Amaihe’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5924 - 2017-09-19
an inaccurate history given to them by Amaihe. ¶16 Dr. Karr’s report sets forth Amaihe’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5924 - 2017-09-19
Randy S. Caflisch v. Julie Staum
on the probate court’s statement that holding Kuhn to the letter of the basic will would give more weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16084 - 2005-03-31
on the probate court’s statement that holding Kuhn to the letter of the basic will would give more weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16084 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the psychologist’s letter because it was a blanket statement without proper support or testimony. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124914 - 2014-10-28
the psychologist’s letter because it was a blanket statement without proper support or testimony. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124914 - 2014-10-28