Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34041 - 34050 of 63223 for records.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
background, her employment history, and her lack of a criminal record. The court also stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85649 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174370 - 2017-09-21

State v. Earl DeWayne Phiffer
not intentionally violated the pretrial order were supported by the record and not clearly erroneous. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19282 - 2005-08-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is entitled to one more day of sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236817 - 2019-03-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
allegations are conclusory, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105988 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162381 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020254 - 2025-10-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report, Rigelsky’s response, and our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239407 - 2019-04-24

[PDF] Annette J. Mueller v. Charles R. Mueller
be the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record and law relied upon are stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10093 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
no record cites[2] for this argument and indeed the argument ignores the State’s concession at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28738 - 2007-04-16