Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34051 - 34060 of 59234 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 34051 - 34060 of 59234 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Valley Bank Northeast v. Angela L. Barta
claimed that the Nutech stock was worth $52,000 to $52,500 in November 1990, or $2.50 per share, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9040 - 2005-03-31
claimed that the Nutech stock was worth $52,000 to $52,500 in November 1990, or $2.50 per share, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9040 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
jeopardy claim Johnson may have had related to Counts 1 and 3 was rendered moot when the court acquitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=281376 - 2020-08-25
jeopardy claim Johnson may have had related to Counts 1 and 3 was rendered moot when the court acquitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=281376 - 2020-08-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
to trial or a dispositive plea. 2 By entering a no-contest plea, the defendant does not claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41824 - 2014-09-15
to trial or a dispositive plea. 2 By entering a no-contest plea, the defendant does not claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41824 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gary D. Kluczynski
). Kluczynski points to several incidents which he claims demonstrate Judge Gibbs’ bias against him. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26066 - 2017-09-21
). Kluczynski points to several incidents which he claims demonstrate Judge Gibbs’ bias against him. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26066 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brent A. Graziano
estranged wife filed a victim impact statement in which she made several claims that he had anger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19416 - 2005-08-30
estranged wife filed a victim impact statement in which she made several claims that he had anger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19416 - 2005-08-30
State v. Jimmie Lee Fonder
is an essential prerequisite to appellate review of a claim that trial counsel was ineffective. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8534 - 2005-03-31
is an essential prerequisite to appellate review of a claim that trial counsel was ineffective. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8534 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
does not appear to claim that, before the December 2007 conversation, she had a reasonable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103379 - 2017-09-21
does not appear to claim that, before the December 2007 conversation, she had a reasonable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement and three years’ extended supervision. ¶6 Dean moved to withdraw his plea claiming he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145440 - 2017-09-21
confinement and three years’ extended supervision. ¶6 Dean moved to withdraw his plea claiming he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145440 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of a prison disciplinary decision and his motion for reconsideration. He raises three claims on appeal: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90908 - 2012-12-20
of a prison disciplinary decision and his motion for reconsideration. He raises three claims on appeal: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90908 - 2012-12-20
CA Blank Order
). There is no arguable merit to a claim that the trial court erred by finding that Green knowingly, intelligently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136246 - 2015-03-02
). There is no arguable merit to a claim that the trial court erred by finding that Green knowingly, intelligently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136246 - 2015-03-02