Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34061 - 34070 of 82596 for case codes/1000.
Search results 34061 - 34070 of 82596 for case codes/1000.
Ashland County v. Lisa R.
was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order that included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17747 - 2005-04-18
was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order that included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17747 - 2005-04-18
[PDF]
State v. Deborah J. Burch
, as Burch appears to suggest, that the facts in this case be as “egregious” as those in other reported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2478 - 2017-09-19
, as Burch appears to suggest, that the facts in this case be as “egregious” as those in other reported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2478 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District ...
2014 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136273 - 2015-02-24
2014 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136273 - 2015-02-24
State v. Roger A. Urbick
suspicion if a “reasonable inference of unlawful conduct can be objectively discerned.” In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14964 - 2005-03-31
suspicion if a “reasonable inference of unlawful conduct can be objectively discerned.” In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14964 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
supreme court case.”) ¶9 As for the Mazemkes’ second request, we begin our analysis by briefly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110001 - 2014-04-08
supreme court case.”) ¶9 As for the Mazemkes’ second request, we begin our analysis by briefly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110001 - 2014-04-08
State v. Paul H. Gates
, stop a person for investigative purposes in cases where he or she may be said to have an "articulable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9826 - 2005-03-31
, stop a person for investigative purposes in cases where he or she may be said to have an "articulable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9826 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert Glickman
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1758-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17123 - 2017-09-21
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1758-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17123 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy J. Bartos
case, Bartos moved for a directed verdict on the grounds that the State had failed to present evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15374 - 2005-03-31
case, Bartos moved for a directed verdict on the grounds that the State had failed to present evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15374 - 2005-03-31
State v. Orbbie Williams
appealed. ¶3 On appeal, we reversed and remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
appealed. ¶3 On appeal, we reversed and remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
State v. D.L.S.
in attempting to prove this case.” The second statement, made during closing arguments as the guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6125 - 2005-03-31
in attempting to prove this case.” The second statement, made during closing arguments as the guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6125 - 2005-03-31