Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34061 - 34070 of 63223 for records.

COURT OF APPEALS
no record cites[2] for this argument and indeed the argument ignores the State’s concession at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28738 - 2007-04-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255485 - 2020-03-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and No. 2024AP167 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925282 - 2025-03-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183691 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. He has not directed us to anywhere in the record where he presented such an affidavit, or any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27429 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95342 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
other convictions were described accurately. The court alluded to King’s extensive record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133272 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
for reconsideration. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105209 - 2013-12-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
upon our No. 2019AP2087-CR 2 review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=420196 - 2021-09-08

State v. Kevin L. Guibord
reviews the record to determine whether it provides a basis for the trial court's exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9045 - 2005-03-31