Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34091 - 34100 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34091 - 34100 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
County of Green Lake v. John T. Welke
motion[2] on the basis that Welke lacked standing because he failed to show a legitimate expectation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16074 - 2005-03-31
motion[2] on the basis that Welke lacked standing because he failed to show a legitimate expectation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16074 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy White
, and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to modify sentence.[2] We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12488 - 2005-03-31
, and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to modify sentence.[2] We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12488 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
an order denying his motion for sentence modification.[1] Rychtik argues that a diagnosis of his mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4660 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for sentence modification.[1] Rychtik argues that a diagnosis of his mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4660 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to suppress evidence. We conclude the circuit court properly denied the motion. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39047 - 2009-08-05
motion to suppress evidence. We conclude the circuit court properly denied the motion. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39047 - 2009-08-05
State v. Kurt G. Culver
. §§ 961.14(4)(t) and 961.41(1m)(h)1 and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Culver argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4130 - 2005-03-31
. §§ 961.14(4)(t) and 961.41(1m)(h)1 and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Culver argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4130 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leon S. Groeschl
. Stat. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)1 and 961.49(1)(b)6. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15255 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)1 and 961.49(1)(b)6. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15255 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court erred in No. 2020AP295-CR 2 denying Vang’s motion to suppress evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355764 - 2021-04-13
the circuit court erred in No. 2020AP295-CR 2 denying Vang’s motion to suppress evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355764 - 2021-04-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
id. at 4. We subsequently denied his motion for reconsideration. ¶3 Funches next returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98457 - 2014-09-15
id. at 4. We subsequently denied his motion for reconsideration. ¶3 Funches next returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98457 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kyle W.F.
on January 7, 1999, the court scheduled another hearing. In the interim, Kyle’s attorney filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
on January 7, 1999, the court scheduled another hearing. In the interim, Kyle’s attorney filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the circuit court granting Zisirtike Z. McMillian’s motion to suppress evidence. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187545 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court granting Zisirtike Z. McMillian’s motion to suppress evidence. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187545 - 2017-09-21