Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34091 - 34100 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34091 - 34100 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a summary judgment motion, arguing that dismissal was required because Jeffrey lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96022 - 2014-09-15
filed a summary judgment motion, arguing that dismissal was required because Jeffrey lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96022 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
an order of the circuit court entered November 11, 2008, granting the postconviction motion of John C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46452 - 2014-09-15
an order of the circuit court entered November 11, 2008, granting the postconviction motion of John C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46452 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charge based on lack of reasonable suspicion to justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35179 - 2014-09-15
erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charge based on lack of reasonable suspicion to justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35179 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
MANGERSON, J.1 The State appeals an order granting Timothy Bastian’s suppression motion based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87429 - 2014-09-15
MANGERSON, J.1 The State appeals an order granting Timothy Bastian’s suppression motion based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87429 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Norman Earl Rhodes
) & (2), and 939.05, STATS. Rhodes also appeals from orders denying his motions for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9010 - 2017-09-19
) & (2), and 939.05, STATS. Rhodes also appeals from orders denying his motions for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9010 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
order denying her motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court was improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34707 - 2008-11-24
order denying her motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court was improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34707 - 2008-11-24
[PDF]
WI App 20
, sitting in its role as the sentencing court, did not have competency to address Williams’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208217 - 2018-04-09
, sitting in its role as the sentencing court, did not have competency to address Williams’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208217 - 2018-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is typical for a traffic stop. ¶5 Stib filed a motion to suppress all evidence obtained, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202430 - 2017-11-15
is typical for a traffic stop. ¶5 Stib filed a motion to suppress all evidence obtained, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202430 - 2017-11-15
Fred W. Schmelzle v. Ken Ade
was entered against the Ades for failure to appear. Later the Ades’ attorney filed a motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
was entered against the Ades for failure to appear. Later the Ades’ attorney filed a motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion. He contends that because the criminal information and judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77723 - 2012-02-07
denying his postconviction motion. He contends that because the criminal information and judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77723 - 2012-02-07