Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3411 - 3420 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3411 - 3420 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reconsideration motion. A person is entitled to sentence credit only for time in custody “in connection
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250717 - 2019-11-25
reconsideration motion. A person is entitled to sentence credit only for time in custody “in connection
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250717 - 2019-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 11, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
to joint custody and held open placement and child support because they were residing together. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98052 - 2013-06-10
to joint custody and held open placement and child support because they were residing together. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98052 - 2013-06-10
Lori B. v. Steven B.
Steven. Until June 1995, she and Steven had joint custody of Kristin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14663 - 2005-03-31
Steven. Until June 1995, she and Steven had joint custody of Kristin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., born March 8, 2005. A judgment of paternity was entered in 2007. The parties stipulated to joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98052 - 2014-09-15
., born March 8, 2005. A judgment of paternity was entered in 2007. The parties stipulated to joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98052 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. ¶2 Wren argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570533 - 2022-09-27
postconviction motion. ¶2 Wren argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570533 - 2022-09-27
[PDF]
WI 50
and custody"; 2) be "an adult who has been determined to be incompetent by a circuit court"; 3) be "so
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82775 - 2014-09-15
and custody"; 2) be "an adult who has been determined to be incompetent by a circuit court"; 3) be "so
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82775 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
and custody"; 2) be "an adult who has been determined to be incompetent by a circuit court"; 3) be "so totally
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82775 - 2012-07-16
and custody"; 2) be "an adult who has been determined to be incompetent by a circuit court"; 3) be "so totally
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82775 - 2012-07-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Lyons’ suppression motion. The court found Lyons was not “in custody” for No. 2021AP687-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634588 - 2023-03-22
Lyons’ suppression motion. The court found Lyons was not “in custody” for No. 2021AP687-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634588 - 2023-03-22
State v. Danny C. Eesley
to the custody of the Ashland County Sheriff, for a preliminary hearing to be held on May 10, 1996. Eesley
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17282 - 2005-03-31
to the custody of the Ashland County Sheriff, for a preliminary hearing to be held on May 10, 1996. Eesley
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17282 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Danny C. Eesley
to the custody of the Ashland County Sheriff, for a preliminary hearing to be held on May 10, 1996. Eesley
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17282 - 2017-09-21
to the custody of the Ashland County Sheriff, for a preliminary hearing to be held on May 10, 1996. Eesley
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17282 - 2017-09-21