Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3411 - 3420 of 30059 for de.
Search results 3411 - 3420 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entitle the defendant to relief presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68343 - 2014-09-15
entitle the defendant to relief presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68343 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62333 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62333 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Z. P.
County: GUY D. REYNOLDS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. 1 Thomas Z.P. seeks a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4426 - 2017-09-19
County: GUY D. REYNOLDS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. 1 Thomas Z.P. seeks a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4426 - 2017-09-19
State v. Garrett A.B.
that we resolve de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364–365, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14068 - 2005-03-31
that we resolve de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364–365, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14068 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alfonso L. Merriweather
it. Id. We review the motion de novo to determine whether sufficient facts are set forth which would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11610 - 2017-09-19
it. Id. We review the motion de novo to determine whether sufficient facts are set forth which would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11610 - 2017-09-19
Joseph Ermenc v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology. See id. Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13665 - 2005-03-31
court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology. See id. Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13665 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2006 WI App 261, ¶10, 298 Wis. 2d 99, 726 N.W.2d 337. However, we “determine de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292541 - 2020-10-01
, 2006 WI App 261, ¶10, 298 Wis. 2d 99, 726 N.W.2d 337. However, we “determine de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292541 - 2020-10-01
[PDF]
State v. William Medina
N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). We review constitutional questions de novo. State v. Keith, 216 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13376 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). We review constitutional questions de novo. State v. Keith, 216 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13376 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ron Strand v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4236 - 2017-09-19
, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4236 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Pekay Speciality Contracting v. Madson Tiling & Excavating, Inc.
complaint based on claim preclusion. We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12812 - 2017-09-21
complaint based on claim preclusion. We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12812 - 2017-09-21