Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3411 - 3420 of 68869 for he.
Search results 3411 - 3420 of 68869 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Julio G.
G., following a bench trial and dispositional hearing. He primarily argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5280 - 2017-09-19
G., following a bench trial and dispositional hearing. He primarily argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5280 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to withdraw his no contest plea before sentencing. Boyd argues on appeal that he established fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135717 - 2015-02-25
motion to withdraw his no contest plea before sentencing. Boyd argues on appeal that he established fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135717 - 2015-02-25
[PDF]
State v. Milton A. Bumpers
of his breath was not a refusal, and that he should have been instructed by the officer that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3707 - 2017-09-19
of his breath was not a refusal, and that he should have been instructed by the officer that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3707 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Statutes are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2013AP1283-CR 2 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112719 - 2017-09-21
Statutes are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2013AP1283-CR 2 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for plea withdrawal. He argued that his plea was not entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
for plea withdrawal. He argued that his plea was not entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Lietz argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112719 - 2014-05-19
. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Lietz argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112719 - 2014-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
941.20(2)(a) (2009-10). 1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. 2 Taylor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149643 - 2017-09-21
941.20(2)(a) (2009-10). 1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. 2 Taylor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149643 - 2017-09-21
State v. Julio G.
a bench trial and dispositional hearing. He primarily argues that the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5280 - 2005-03-31
a bench trial and dispositional hearing. He primarily argues that the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for plea withdrawal. He argued that his plea was not entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
for plea withdrawal. He argued that his plea was not entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
State v. Ronald J. Frank
for sexual contact with a child under the age of thirteen years, contrary to Wis. Stat. ยง 948.02(1).[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3944 - 2005-03-31
for sexual contact with a child under the age of thirteen years, contrary to Wis. Stat. ยง 948.02(1).[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3944 - 2005-03-31