Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3411 - 3420 of 6143 for li.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the sentence would have arguable merit. Sentencing lies within the trial court’s discretion, and our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128637 - 2017-09-21

Rock County Human Services Department v. Zenia C.
argues that this is a question for the jury, not the court. The admission of evidence lies within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14615 - 2005-03-31

State v. Paula Oltrogge
evidence lies within the discretion of the trial court.” Hennig v. Ahearn, 230 Wis. 2d 149, 178, 601 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15423 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sentence. Sentencing lies within the trial court’s discretion, and our review is limited to determining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145379 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The admissibility of evidence lies within the circuit court’s sound discretion. State v. Pepin, 110 Wis. 2d 431
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=351083 - 2021-03-30

Pamela E. Wautier v. Galen H. Wautier
, not that either party had lied. Credibility assessments are for the trial court, not this court, to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4366 - 2005-03-31

State v. Minko Lewis
. Id. Consequently, the fact that a police informant lied to the affiant who, in turn, included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4021 - 2005-03-31

State v. James L. Schuman
be that a jury would dismiss all of this as a pack of lies,” because the defendant’s story was “both detailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14356 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
shot, but acknowledged telling Yde his passengers were upset about it, saying he lied so Yde would let
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34164 - 2008-09-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to grant a mistrial is a decision that lies within the sound discretion of the circuit court.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190565 - 2017-09-21