Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3411 - 3420 of 58927 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
children. He claims the trial court erred in admitting evidence of events which occurred prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4564 - 2017-09-19

James Cowden v. David Kadlec
believed that the CBRF had been completed by November 5 and mailed a thirty-day notice to quit or pay rent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3965 - 2005-03-31

Michael Baxter v. William Lynch
Lynch an additional $1000 and transfer title to a camper to Lynch. Baxter claimed that Lynch ceased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24912 - 2006-05-02

State v. Charles Jasper, Jr.
sentence. Jasper claims that the trial court erred by: (1) determining that trial counsel effectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2440 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
.[1] Peter T. appeals orders terminating his parental rights to four children. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4565 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Louis Elizondo, Jr.
out to the court that Elizondo and his wife knew quite well what they were doing, and realized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10169 - 2017-09-19

State v. Ronald Leroy Beilke
about any sort of quibbles like this. What this case comes down to quite simply is one question. Did he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12430 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
… the log times and pull over times don’t quite add up.” Nonetheless, the trial court denied Nelis’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54421 - 2010-09-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
termination decision. However, we first consider whether there is any arguable merit to a claim the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174983 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Daniel R. Taylor v. Susan M. Taylor
No. 02-0118 2 following the date of divorce. Susan claims that she should receive a sum equal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4827 - 2017-09-19