Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3411 - 3420 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 3411 - 3420 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Daryl M. Knighten
to § 943.32(1)(a), STATS. 1 On appeal, Knighten raises the following issues: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11401 - 2017-09-19
to § 943.32(1)(a), STATS. 1 On appeal, Knighten raises the following issues: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11401 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because it failed to consider the best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249806 - 2019-11-12
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because it failed to consider the best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249806 - 2019-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject his arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35584 - 2009-02-17
for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject his arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35584 - 2009-02-17
State v. Sebastian "Frank" Bustamante
., 1977,[1] after a jury trial. Bustamante argues the trial court improperly admitted other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9616 - 2005-03-31
., 1977,[1] after a jury trial. Bustamante argues the trial court improperly admitted other acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9616 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lisimba Love
for a Machner hearing and for resentencing. 2 Love claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3765 - 2017-09-19
for a Machner hearing and for resentencing. 2 Love claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3765 - 2017-09-19
Peter L. Walls v. Pamela A. Walls
Pamela A. Walls. He argues that the trial should have been adjourned, that the property division failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10316 - 2005-03-31
Pamela A. Walls. He argues that the trial should have been adjourned, that the property division failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10316 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Peter L. Walls v. Pamela A. Walls
that the trial should have been adjourned, that the property division failed to enforce a pretrial stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10316 - 2017-09-20
that the trial should have been adjourned, that the property division failed to enforce a pretrial stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10316 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael Schulteis
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4102 - 2017-09-20
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4102 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for an appropriate sentence. The trial court conducted a plea colloquy with Stewart, accepted Stewart’s guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154160 - 2017-09-21
for an appropriate sentence. The trial court conducted a plea colloquy with Stewart, accepted Stewart’s guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154160 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
motion for sentencing relief. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26959 - 2006-10-30
motion for sentencing relief. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26959 - 2006-10-30