Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3411 - 3420 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 3411 - 3420 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Lisimba Love
claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective because she failed to object to the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3765 - 2005-03-31
claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective because she failed to object to the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3765 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ismet D. Divanovic
right to be present at all critical stages of the trial court proceedings, (2) he was denied his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8843 - 2005-03-31
right to be present at all critical stages of the trial court proceedings, (2) he was denied his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8843 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daryl M. Knighten
to § 943.32(1)(a), Stats.[1] On appeal, Knighten raises the following issues: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11401 - 2005-03-31
to § 943.32(1)(a), Stats.[1] On appeal, Knighten raises the following issues: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11401 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daryl M. Knighten
to § 943.32(1)(a), STATS. 1 On appeal, Knighten raises the following issues: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11401 - 2017-09-19
to § 943.32(1)(a), STATS. 1 On appeal, Knighten raises the following issues: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11401 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because it failed to consider the best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249806 - 2019-11-12
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because it failed to consider the best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249806 - 2019-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject his arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35584 - 2009-02-17
for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject his arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35584 - 2009-02-17
[PDF]
State v. Lisimba Love
for a Machner hearing and for resentencing. 2 Love claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3765 - 2017-09-19
for a Machner hearing and for resentencing. 2 Love claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3765 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2007-08).[2] Harris takes issue with the trial court’s decision to allow into evidence testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53412 - 2010-08-16
) (2007-08).[2] Harris takes issue with the trial court’s decision to allow into evidence testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53412 - 2010-08-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35584 - 2014-09-15
for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35584 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Sebastian Frank Bustamante
for second-degree murder of his son, Jason, contrary to § 940.02(1), STATS., 1977,1 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9616 - 2017-09-19
for second-degree murder of his son, Jason, contrary to § 940.02(1), STATS., 1977,1 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9616 - 2017-09-19