Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34101 - 34110 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34101 - 34110 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Charles Jones
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues: (1) his conviction was obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues: (1) his conviction was obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Maus filed a motion for a new trial, which the federal court denied. Maus then filed a complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848542 - 2024-09-12
. Maus filed a motion for a new trial, which the federal court denied. Maus then filed a complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848542 - 2024-09-12
State v. John H. Maclin
, Maclin filed a motion to vacate the restitution order that essentially remained open and undetermined.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19379 - 2005-08-22
, Maclin filed a motion to vacate the restitution order that essentially remained open and undetermined.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19379 - 2005-08-22
District IV November 11, 2014 To: Hon. John C. Albert Circuit Court Judge Dane County Courthouse ...
judgment, which the circuit court granted. The court also denied Stokes’ motion to compel the defendants
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128240 - 2014-11-10
judgment, which the circuit court granted. The court also denied Stokes’ motion to compel the defendants
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128240 - 2014-11-10
State v. Irvon L. Crawford
against Crawford and codefendant Torrence Douglas. Crawford filed a motion for severance, a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12647 - 2005-03-31
against Crawford and codefendant Torrence Douglas. Crawford filed a motion for severance, a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12647 - 2005-03-31
The Lakefront Neighborhood Coalition v. City of Milwaukee
it concluded at the motion to dismiss stage that the plaintiffs did not have standing to pursue this matter, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4405 - 2005-03-31
it concluded at the motion to dismiss stage that the plaintiffs did not have standing to pursue this matter, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4405 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to suppress evidence. We conclude the circuit court properly denied the motion. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39047 - 2009-10-27
motion to suppress evidence. We conclude the circuit court properly denied the motion. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39047 - 2009-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissing his complaint against the Town of Brooklyn[1] and an order denying his motion for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34253 - 2008-10-08
dismissing his complaint against the Town of Brooklyn[1] and an order denying his motion for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34253 - 2008-10-08
Barbara J. Dullere v. Derek J. Dullere
for an order declaring the appeal frivolous. We affirm, but deny Derek’s motion for costs and fees. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24929 - 2006-04-26
for an order declaring the appeal frivolous. We affirm, but deny Derek’s motion for costs and fees. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24929 - 2006-04-26
State v. Anthony Kane
not misuse its discretion in denying Kane’s motion to withdraw his Alford pleas. We further conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15092 - 2005-03-31
not misuse its discretion in denying Kane’s motion to withdraw his Alford pleas. We further conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15092 - 2005-03-31