Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34101 - 34110 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.

COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his motion for a mistrial. Because we conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51299 - 2010-06-29

State v. Richard V. Stiglitz
. Stiglitz objected to the motion because the State failed to make the motion within the one-year time period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3118 - 2005-03-31

State v. Derrick Emerson
and an order denying his postconviction motion for relief. He challenges the imposition of the penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31

Village of Twin Lakes v. Donald F. Hansen
that there was insufficient evidence presented at the hearing on his motion challenging the probable cause to arrest him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16234 - 2008-03-18

[PDF] State v. Christopher S. Vnuk
on the motion, the court granted the motion as to the evidence obtained in Vnuk’s bedroom and bathroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25239 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Barbara J. Dullere v. Derek J. Dullere
Derek’s motion for costs and fees. ¶2 The parties married in October 2000 and divorced in September
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24929 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gemma L. Kitzman
court’s denial of her motion to dismiss or suppress. Specifically, Kitzman argues that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10771 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] City of Madison v. Cynthia J. Vernon
after a motion for reconsideration of the circuit court’s previous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14295 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a judgment of conviction for burglary, as a repeater, and from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191299 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction motion raising this issue and because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09