Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34101 - 34110 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
Search results 34101 - 34110 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 10, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26695 - 2006-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 10, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26695 - 2006-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
of the road, traveling between 30 and 32 mph.” The court’s concluding sentences were: “In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29819 - 2007-07-25
of the road, traveling between 30 and 32 mph.” The court’s concluding sentences were: “In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29819 - 2007-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 26, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33189 - 2008-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 26, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33189 - 2008-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33688 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33688 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.107(6)(am). This court remanded the case to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107968 - 2014-02-12
for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.107(6)(am). This court remanded the case to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107968 - 2014-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. [4] The trial court found that the power of attorney was valid.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78035 - 2012-02-13
in this case. [4] The trial court found that the power of attorney was valid.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78035 - 2012-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 3, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98790 - 2013-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 3, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98790 - 2013-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
] states: “The court shall reverse or remand the case to the agency if it finds that the agency’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56776 - 2010-11-15
] states: “The court shall reverse or remand the case to the agency if it finds that the agency’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56776 - 2010-11-15
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing in this case, after ascertaining that Santiago-Valdez wished to plead guilty, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103241 - 2013-10-21
hearing in this case, after ascertaining that Santiago-Valdez wished to plead guilty, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103241 - 2013-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 11, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35741 - 2009-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 11, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35741 - 2009-03-10