Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34121 - 34130 of 98490 for civil court case status online.
Search results 34121 - 34130 of 98490 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 30, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51347 - 2010-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 30, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51347 - 2010-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 26, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109487 - 2014-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 26, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109487 - 2014-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 4, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31049 - 2007-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 4, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31049 - 2007-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 9, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73299 - 2011-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 9, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73299 - 2011-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 22, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40992 - 2009-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 22, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40992 - 2009-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 6, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88997 - 2012-11-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 6, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88997 - 2012-11-05
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred. State v. R.R.R., 166 Wis. 2d 306, 311, 479 N.W.2d 237 (Ct. App. 1991). In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29549 - 2007-07-02
court erred. State v. R.R.R., 166 Wis. 2d 306, 311, 479 N.W.2d 237 (Ct. App. 1991). In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29549 - 2007-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. For all of these reasons, we affirm. By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99746 - 2013-07-22
in this case. For all of these reasons, we affirm. By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99746 - 2013-07-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 19, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59079 - 2011-01-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 19, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59079 - 2011-01-18
COURT OF APPEALS
and circumstances of the case. Mercado-Torres argues that the court did not set forth a “nexus between the factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38397 - 2009-07-27
and circumstances of the case. Mercado-Torres argues that the court did not set forth a “nexus between the factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38397 - 2009-07-27