Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34121 - 34130 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.

COURT OF APPEALS
was an automatic weapon. The weapon was confiscated, test-fired, and did prove to be an automatic weapon, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33865 - 2008-09-02

Ruven George Seibert v. Phillip Macht
to apply two-part Strickland test because "the obligation of advocacy required of counsel by Anders
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17591 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint.” Watts v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147292 - 2015-08-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and testing of a 2012 DNA sample from Dixon; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=560077 - 2022-08-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
from the police report, the preliminary hearing transcript, and the CAC forensic interview. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131680 - 2017-09-21

David C. Myers v. Daren Swenson
a motion to quash and a motion to dismiss test the legal sufficiency of the facts alleged in the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6858 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael L. Washington
not receive effective assistance of counsel. The two-pronged test that we employ on this question is set out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9770 - 2015-08-27

State v. Latosha Armstead
, 276, 496 N.W.2d 74, 83 (1993) (quoted source omitted). “The first prong of the vagueness test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13160 - 2005-03-31

WI App 129 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1898-CR Complete Ti...
, the defendant’s right to silence was scrupulously honored.”). ¶28 Mosley sets forth a five-factor test used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70319 - 2013-04-23

[PDF] WI APP 102
associations” in articulating a test requiring benevolence). No. 2011AP1479 2011AP2693 12 ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86414 - 2014-09-15