Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34131 - 34140 of 62360 for child support.

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Walter L. Harvey
, as that conclusion is supported by facts based on testimony and documentary evidence presented at a lengthy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16884 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
that the record supported a total of 20 counts of misconduct. We do not repeat all of the factual findings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105517 - 2013-12-11

[PDF] NOTICE
the testimony of a number of other witnesses to support his contention that his suppression motion would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50893 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Walter L. Harvey
and misrepresentation in this matter, as that conclusion is supported by facts based on testimony and documentary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16884 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Walter Leutenegger
observations supporting the inference that Leutenegger was intoxicated. Leutenegger was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6066 - 2017-09-19

Affordable Erecting, Inc. v. Neosho Trompler, Inc.
of the facts supports a contrary conclusion, the decision to apply the doctrine of equitable estoppel is within
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25481 - 2006-06-08

[PDF] Affordable Erecting, Inc. v. Neosho Trompler, Inc.
estoppel are present, and no alternate view of the facts supports a contrary conclusion, the decision
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25481 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Joseph R. King
On October 31, 2003, the trial court held a hearing on King’s motion to withdraw his pleas. In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25477 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Northland Whitehall Apartments Limited Partnership v. City of Whitehall Board of Review
with the statutory mandate’” and “‘if it can be supported by any reasonable view of the evidence.’” Id. Moreover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21521 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548789 - 2022-07-28