Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34141 - 34150 of 39147 for c's.
Search results 34141 - 34150 of 39147 for c's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Winnebago County: SCOTT C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681996 - 2023-07-26
., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Winnebago County: SCOTT C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681996 - 2023-07-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted; first set of ellipses in Carter). “[C]ounsel’s performance need not be perfect, nor even very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206797 - 2018-01-17
omitted; first set of ellipses in Carter). “[C]ounsel’s performance need not be perfect, nor even very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206797 - 2018-01-17
COURT OF APPEALS
reversal in this case. C. Ineffective Assistance. ¶23 Harris’ final contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132025 - 2015-01-01
reversal in this case. C. Ineffective Assistance. ¶23 Harris’ final contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132025 - 2015-01-01
State v. Luther Wade Cofield
Laurence C. Gram, Jr., sentenced Cofield to a fifty-year prison term on one count of sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5877 - 2005-03-31
Laurence C. Gram, Jr., sentenced Cofield to a fifty-year prison term on one count of sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5877 - 2005-03-31
State v. George Stone
was presented with the issue, and we cannot substitute our judgment for that of the jury. C. Rape Shield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14830 - 2005-03-31
was presented with the issue, and we cannot substitute our judgment for that of the jury. C. Rape Shield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14830 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jose Carlos Navarro
without delay of his rights under this sub-paragraph; (c) consular officers shall have the right to visit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5096 - 2005-03-31
without delay of his rights under this sub-paragraph; (c) consular officers shall have the right to visit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5096 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence, “a reasonable person c[ould] interpret these statements as the court’s reiteration of the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100617 - 2013-08-12
sentence, “a reasonable person c[ould] interpret these statements as the court’s reiteration of the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100617 - 2013-08-12
2010 WI APP 150
with any Laws or Regulations.” Similarly, the “[c]ontractor shall be solely responsible for initiating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54983 - 2010-11-16
with any Laws or Regulations.” Similarly, the “[c]ontractor shall be solely responsible for initiating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54983 - 2010-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
trial counsel’s performance.[5] C. Destruction of Evidence ¶15 Truss also alleged that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89959 - 2012-12-03
trial counsel’s performance.[5] C. Destruction of Evidence ¶15 Truss also alleged that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89959 - 2012-12-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
briefs do not conform to WIS. STAT. RULES 809.19(1)(a), (3)(a)2. and (6)(c)2. because they do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79706 - 2014-09-15
briefs do not conform to WIS. STAT. RULES 809.19(1)(a), (3)(a)2. and (6)(c)2. because they do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79706 - 2014-09-15