Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34141 - 34150 of 68502 for did.
Search results 34141 - 34150 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and conclude that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. The customary common law rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191001 - 2017-09-21
and conclude that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. The customary common law rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191001 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Teresa Robelia
with Chasity, and to an incident when Robelia slammed Chasity into a swing. Counsel did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12484 - 2017-09-21
with Chasity, and to an incident when Robelia slammed Chasity into a swing. Counsel did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12484 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
replied that she did not know if “relied is the correct word.” Rather, she said the “articles validate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166258 - 2017-09-21
replied that she did not know if “relied is the correct word.” Rather, she said the “articles validate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166258 - 2017-09-21
State v. Buren F. Sprague
or revocations did not contribute to his conviction for OMVWI in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13009 - 2005-03-31
or revocations did not contribute to his conviction for OMVWI in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13009 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing because Crawford did not apply and the out-of-court statements of Cynthia and the victim were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109487 - 2014-03-25
hearing because Crawford did not apply and the out-of-court statements of Cynthia and the victim were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109487 - 2014-03-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
she was then taking did not interfere with her ability to understand the proceeding. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174102 - 2017-09-21
she was then taking did not interfere with her ability to understand the proceeding. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174102 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jimmie L. Perkins
the van, the officer discovered that Perkins, the driver, did not have a driver’s license. After taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7280 - 2005-03-31
the van, the officer discovered that Perkins, the driver, did not have a driver’s license. After taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7280 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and the medication he was taking; he has no explanation for why trial counsel did not accurately note them in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49272 - 2010-04-26
and the medication he was taking; he has no explanation for why trial counsel did not accurately note them in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49272 - 2010-04-26
CA Blank Order
no bearing on Vaughn’s assertion that he did not have the correct information when making his decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143006 - 2015-06-16
no bearing on Vaughn’s assertion that he did not have the correct information when making his decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143006 - 2015-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of the settlement. The circuit court ruled that the Morters did not have just cause to fire the attorneys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35259 - 2009-01-20
of the settlement. The circuit court ruled that the Morters did not have just cause to fire the attorneys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35259 - 2009-01-20