Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34141 - 34150 of 46753 for shows.
Search results 34141 - 34150 of 46753 for shows.
COURT OF APPEALS
is not a managerial employee is a reasonable determination. The burden of showing the Commission’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28725 - 2007-04-16
is not a managerial employee is a reasonable determination. The burden of showing the Commission’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28725 - 2007-04-16
Brian Scott Hall v. Suk-Hee Sarah Hall
We agree with Suk-Hee that her former husband’s testimony was prior bad act evidence offered to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5748 - 2005-03-31
We agree with Suk-Hee that her former husband’s testimony was prior bad act evidence offered to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5748 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter J. Davies
by the circuit court showing that any Notice or Order was ever issued. In our view, where the court finds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5475 - 2005-03-31
by the circuit court showing that any Notice or Order was ever issued. In our view, where the court finds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5475 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anne Carol Van Dommelen
that the refusal was proper has the burden of production to present enough evidence to make a prima facie showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18821 - 2005-07-05
that the refusal was proper has the burden of production to present enough evidence to make a prima facie showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18821 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that a new factor exists; and (2) show that the alleged new factor justifies sentence modification. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
that a new factor exists; and (2) show that the alleged new factor justifies sentence modification. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
State v. Samuel H. Warp
assertions that would show why he would have placed any special emphasis on his parole eligibility when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14337 - 2005-03-31
assertions that would show why he would have placed any special emphasis on his parole eligibility when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14337 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
status as a repeat offender. The record shows, however, that the State established Hrenak’s criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33696 - 2008-08-11
status as a repeat offender. The record shows, however, that the State established Hrenak’s criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33696 - 2008-08-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, a defendant must either show that the plea colloquy was defective in a manner that resulted in the defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=412657 - 2021-08-24
, a defendant must either show that the plea colloquy was defective in a manner that resulted in the defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=412657 - 2021-08-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
videos of the attack showed the perpetrator wearing the same clothing Oliver told his brother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716538 - 2023-10-17
videos of the attack showed the perpetrator wearing the same clothing Oliver told his brother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716538 - 2023-10-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
will be admissible to show probable cause for an arrest, if the arrest is challenged.” Id. at 316. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33672 - 2014-09-15
will be admissible to show probable cause for an arrest, if the arrest is challenged.” Id. at 316. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33672 - 2014-09-15