Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34151 - 34160 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 34151 - 34160 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
State v. Kevin N. Dornbrook
In this case, however, the circuit court thoroughly analyzed the application of the facts to the fair and just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15176 - 2005-03-31
In this case, however, the circuit court thoroughly analyzed the application of the facts to the fair and just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15176 - 2005-03-31
State v. Warren C. Walker
cases. It was concerned that the number of pending cases was indicative that “there were other charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19426 - 2005-08-30
cases. It was concerned that the number of pending cases was indicative that “there were other charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19426 - 2005-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Hinderman responds that, in this case, the circuit court correctly concluded that officers must have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134923 - 2017-09-21
. Hinderman responds that, in this case, the circuit court correctly concluded that officers must have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134923 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Calumet County Health & Social Services v. Michael J.R.
rights case. Michael J.R., whose rights to his four natural children were terminated, raises three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4240 - 2017-09-19
rights case. Michael J.R., whose rights to his four natural children were terminated, raises three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4240 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was on probation for a juvenile adjudication in a robbery case—to five years’ initial confinement and five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101681 - 2017-09-21
was on probation for a juvenile adjudication in a robbery case—to five years’ initial confinement and five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101681 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
with Amanda G., accepted the stipulation, and heard testimony from a family case manager that allowed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114758 - 2014-06-11
with Amanda G., accepted the stipulation, and heard testimony from a family case manager that allowed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114758 - 2014-06-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
Rutzinski’s case and J.L. that supported its conclusion: (1) the informant in Rutzinski exposed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29994 - 2014-09-15
Rutzinski’s case and J.L. that supported its conclusion: (1) the informant in Rutzinski exposed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29994 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
placed Lemons in a lineup with five men who were not suspects in the case. The lineup procedure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226064 - 2018-10-30
placed Lemons in a lineup with five men who were not suspects in the case. The lineup procedure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226064 - 2018-10-30
State v. Charles W. Randle
decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court of State of Wisconsin v. David C. Liebnitz Case No. 98-2182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2202 - 2005-03-31
decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court of State of Wisconsin v. David C. Liebnitz Case No. 98-2182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2202 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. While the no-merit report recites the procedural history of the case, the report discusses only
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596700 - 2022-12-07
. While the no-merit report recites the procedural history of the case, the report discusses only
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596700 - 2022-12-07